Sales and Sales Management Blog

September 8, 2010

Guest Article: “Do You Need a Sales–Consultant, -Coach, or -Trainer?” by Christian Maurer


This is the first time I’ve had the chance to feature an article by my friend Christian Maurer.  Be advised that English is not Christian’s first language–so if a sentence comes across as a little awkward, live with it.  His oral and written English is better than most of us native speakers.

——————————————————————————————–

Do You Need a Sales-Consultant, -Coach or -Trainer?
by Christian Marurer

Is this differentiation necessary when you are looking for help with your initiative to increase sales productivity?

The fact that all three terms are listed on many LinkedIn profiles (mine included) can mean two things. Either, it suggests that the terms are taken as interchangeable and listing them all gives a higher chance to be found depending of the preferred term used by those seeking help. Or, these are three different roles.

I believe these are different roles needed for different phases in your initiative. I have listed them on my profile to indicate that I can assume all three roles.

Consultants
have a deep knowledge of their field. They have tools to diagnose the root causes of sales productivity problems. Based on the diagnosis, they can then design a therapy plan how to eliminate the detected inhibitors for higher sales productivity. They have a methodology how to do this. The therapy plans are based on modules that can be mixed and matched, extended or contracted depending on the diagnosis. Only few sales consultants stop their service offering at this level. Most of them will then also help with the execution of the therapy plan. They will then take on the roles of trainers and coaches.

Consultants are best engaged early in the initiative or when derailed initiatives need to be brought back on course.

Consultants can even help you deciding whether an initiative is needed or not. In this case, both parties must understand that the diagnosis is a free standing separately billable item and that the engagement might end after the diagnosis phase.

It might also be advisable to consider the development of the therapy plan as a separately payable free standing engagement. The customer then has a higher guarantee that the consultant is not just trying to peddle his/her teaching and coaching services and will recommend third parties if this improves the execution of the plan.

The term consultant is also used for people giving you advise how to implement a prepackaged methodology , process or piece of software to improve sales productivity. Their diagnostics are geared to confirm the fit between their solution and a problem. Getting help from this type of consultants in early phases of an initiative bears the risk, that they might see every problem as a “nail”, because the only tool they have is a “hammer” (their particular offering).

Trainers
have internalized a body of knowledge (best practices) how to improve sales efficiency and/or effectiveness. They transfer their knowledge to their trainees through lecturing, case studies, tests and practical exercises. They do this in classrooms, interactive web based sessions or a blended combination which might also include self paced learning modules. They have their own intellectual property (body of knowledge) or are certified to use the material proprietary to a third party.

Organizations not wanting to use consultants to carry out a diagnosis to help shape their initiative and engaging trainers only and maybe consultants advising on the use of a particular solution, rely on a self diagnosis of the problems. They must accept that the cause for potential failure of the initiative is not always the training. It is as likely that the failure is caused by a superfluously carried out diagnosis or by jumping prematurely to conclusions.

Coaches
have an intimate knowledge what best practice behavior, leading to higher efficiency and/or effectiveness looks like. They observe those to be coached in real life situations or role plays or they review outputs (e.g. plans) and identify gaps between what they observe and best practice. They then advise the person to be coached what behavior changes are needed to get closer to best practice. Coaching is usually an iterative process. The coach will observe how well the advise is internalized and has improved behavior and will recommend further changes if gaps are still significant. This loop will be repeated until gaps have disappeared or have at least reached a tolerable level.

For a coach to be effective, there must be an agreement between the customer and the coach, what best practices had previously been taught and need reinforcement.

Using trainers who taught best practices as coaches,assures knowledge about the best practices to be reinforced. Knowing how to train best practices does though not mean automatically also knowing how to coach best practices. There is a difference in approach. Trainers used as coaches might also earlier come to the conclusion that gaps are so huge that refresher training or re-training is needed before coaching can be effective.

Conclusion
Distinguishing the three roles and understanding which role is needed when in a sales productivity improvement initiative and what the prerequisites are, gives a higher certainty for a successful outcome.

Within each role, there are though also variants to be considered. Ignoring these variants, might also cause the initiative not delivering the expected results.

When you seek help to improve sales productivity, do you make the distinction of roles?

How would you describe these roles?

Do you have experience on this topic you would like to share?

Christian Maurer is a consultant, coach and trainer, who helps B2B sales leaders, who admit performance problems of their organizations, to define and implement solutions based on new thinking. Christian works with Fortune 500 companies as well as with local and regional champions. He conducts business in German, English and French. He is  a frequent speaker in events organized by the Institute for Marketing and Retail of the University of St. Gallen , Switzerland and a member of the visiting faculty of ZfU International Business School in Thalwil, Switzerland.  Visit his blog.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by True Small Business, GoodSelling. GoodSelling said: Guest Article: “Do You Need a Sales–Consultant, -Coach, or -Trainer?” by Christian Maurer http://bit.ly/b3nnLQ […]

    Pingback by Tweets that mention Guest Article: “Do You Need a Sales–Consultant, -Coach, or -Trainer?” by Christian Maurer « Sales and Sales Management Blog -- Topsy.com — September 8, 2010 @ 10:55 am | Reply

  2. Christian, I usualy agree with you but not today! As a consultant I have to say I wish to the high heavens that this statement were true “The term consultant is also used for people giving you advise how to implement a prepackaged methodology , process or piece of software to improve sales productivity. Their diagnostics are geared to confirm the fit between their solution and a problem. Getting help from this type of consultants in early phases of an initiative bears the risk, that they might see every problem as a “nail”, because the only tool they have is a “hammer” (their particular offering).” Then we could create once and sell many times which we do not. I actually think the statement holds more truth when applied to trainers/coaches.

    Here are just a few of the variables that we consider when delivering our Inside Sales consulting services: size of company, branding and name recognition, target verticals, buyer personas, distribution and demand generation strategy, where are they in the technology adoption life cycle, experience of management team, technology infrastructure… I could go on and on.

    These variables dramatically impact our recommendations and prohibit us from delivering cookie cutter solutions. Like I said, my margins would be much more robust if I could do so!

    Anyway, just felt like sticking up for myself and many of the other fabulous consulting firms we partner with. Thanks for listening!

    Comment by trish bertuzzi — September 9, 2010 @ 7:04 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: